New York Court Wrangles With Asset Division With One Spouse Deceased

While divorce isn't always inevitable, death is. Unfortunately, sometimes the two intersect. In many cases, this frankly simplifies matters. For example, there is usually no longer a need to battle an estranged spouse on matters of child custody, visitation or maintenance costs. However, Brooklyn divorce attorneys recognize there are many situations in which a death...
New York Court Wrangles With Asset Division With One Spouse Deceased Continue reading…

Brooklyn Child Support Modification Requests Must be Preceded by Significant Changes

Court-ordered child support payments are set based on a number of factors, including both parties' income, obligations and the needs of the children. Given that such careful consideration is made to the determination of this figure, Brooklyn child support modification attorneys are well aware that judges aren't inclined to modify the original order...
Brooklyn Child Support Modification Requests Must be Preceded by Significant Changes Continue reading…

Davidson v. Carrilo – Importance of Attorney Represention in Brooklyn Child Custody Matters

It can be tempting when pursuing action in family court to represent ones' self. After all, it's not required, and why not save the money on attorney's fees, right? The problem is that this often ends up costing more in the long run, whether directly in cash or assets or, as in cases of child...
Davidson v. Carrilo – Importance of Attorney Represention in Brooklyn Child Custody Matters Continue reading…

White v. Howard – Life Insurance Policy May be Considered a Form of Alimony

Divorcing couples tend to think of "alimony" as monthly payments made in the form of cash to one spouse or the other, usually for a finite period of time that terminates by a certain date or in the event  of remarriage. For the most part, this is exactly true. However, the Georgia Supreme Court recently...
White v. Howard – Life Insurance Policy May be Considered a Form of Alimony Continue reading…

Boulds v. Nielson – Just Because You Weren’t Married Doesn’t Mean You Won’t End Up in Court

Cohabitation has quickly become "the new normal" for couples in the U.S., with women more commonly choosing to live with men first before marriage, and many of those relationships never being legally formalized. However, Manhattan divorce attorneys know that just because a couple wasn't married doesn't necessarily mean that disputes won't be handled in...
Boulds v. Nielson – Just Because You Weren’t Married Doesn’t Mean You Won’t End Up in Court Continue reading…